Professor Isabelle Brocas, University of Southern California

"Developmental Meritocracy"
Wednesday, 8 May. 3 p.m.
Zoom

Register here

Abstract

A sample of 2,883 children and teenagers aged 5 to 18 in the United States and Spain participate in a third party dictator game where they can influence the rewards of the winner and the loser of a competition. We explore three methods for determining the competition’s winner (talent, effort, and luck) and two methods to allocate rewards (redistribution from winner to loser and addition to winner and loser). Participants are reluctant to transfer rewards from the winner to the loser, resulting in more meritocratic allocations in the redistribution scenario across all age groups. In contrast, the addition scenario exhibits strong age-related effects, with ex-post fairness peaking during middle school and then declining. These trends are consistent across populations and across socioeconomic backgrounds. Merit-based allocations are more frequent when participants compete in a task that requires talent. Allocation decisions are influenced by experience, which reduces the gap between redistribution and addition. They are also affected by perceived performance, personality traits, and affective processes.

Bio

I am a Professor at the University of Southern California and the co-director of the Los Angeles Behavioral Economics Laboratory (LABEL) and the Theoretical Research in Neuroeconomic Decision-making (TREND) Institute. My research revisits standard theories of decision-making and aims at better understanding how people make choices, what motivates them and what cognitive limitations prevent them from making rational choices.

For further information, please contact business-school-research@glasgow.ac.uk

We foster a positive and productive environment for seminars through our Code of conduct.

First published: 11 March 2024

<< 2024


Related links