Centre for Public Policy convenes roundtable to discuss Innovation Districts
Published: 12 December 2024
12 December 2024: In November, the Centre for Public Policy brought together academics, national and local government to discuss Innovation Districts and a new report from the International Public Policy Observatory (IPPO) that outlines how Innovation Districts can create economic growth.
At the event on 28 November 2024, attendees discussed the recent report, Growth Beacons - How Urban Innovation Districts Can Create and Spread Prosperity, written by Geoff Mulgan, Jeremy Williams and Hope McGee.
Read the report: Growth Beacons - How Urban Innovation Districts Can Create and Spread Prosperity
The report:
- makes the case for Innovations Districts, highlighting the key role they can play in facilitating economic growth, while sharing their benefits broadly with local people
- looks at what national and local governments can do to help them succeed both economically and socially
Key discussion outcomes
The event featured a presentation from author Jeremy Williams, and five-minute lightning talks - or ‘provocations’ - from Duncan Booker, Glasgow City Council, James Finnie, Community Enterprise in Scotland (CEIS), and Simon Smith, UK Innovations District Group (UKIDG).
The roundtable discussion that followed generated conversations around some key themes:
Embedding innovation districts: How can innovation districts be embedded within long term policy outlooks, given the lags between an investment taking place and the place shaping effects that may emerge, and the importance of taking a systems view and building buy-in from a wider set of stakeholders.
Negative effects: It is important to be alert to the potential negative or unintended effects of innovation districts and consider how to ward off or mitigate such impacts.
The social economy: The social economy, which reflects a notable share of Glasgow's economy, must have a stake in the innovation district process; advocates pointed to the importance of this sector of the economy in sustaining the local social fabric.
Community: Innovation Districts need to be porous and accessible sites to support community engagement.
Celebrating positive impacts: While being attentive to the challenges and potential downsides that innovation districts may engender, ‘talking up’ the innovation system in Glasgow is important, for the notable contribution it is making to the city-region's changing economic story.
Young people: The role of young people was noted in several respects, from nurturing aspiration and shaping long skills pipelines, to considering what young people can do as entrepreneurial actors themselves.
Complex policymaking landscape: The complex policy landscape was highlighted by attendees and whether there is potential for:
- future devolution to local authorities
- linking the multiple strands of innovation strategy (UK Government, Scottish Government and local governments)
Previous policy forays should inform the present: Though innovation districts are not precisely the same, there may be scope for learning from previous attempts at building clusters and intermediate technology institutes, from what worked well and less well before.
Read the report: Growth Beacons - How Urban Innovation Districts Can Create and Spread Prosperity
Find out more
The Centre for Public Policy is the home of the International Public Policy Observatory (IPPO) at the University of Glasgow.
The International Public Policy Observatory (IPPO) aims to mobilise and assess evidence from across the four nations of the United Kingdom, and beyond, to inform policymakers about the best ways to address social harms.
Useful links
Visit the International Public Policy Observatory (IPPO) website.
Find out more about the Glasgow Riverside Innovation District.
First published: 12 December 2024
The International Public Policy Observatory
The Centre for Public Policy is the home of the International Public Policy Observatory (IPPO) at the University of Glasgow.
The International Public Policy Observatory (IPPO) aims to mobilise and assess evidence from across the four nations of the United Kingdom, and beyond, to inform policymakers about the best ways to address social harms.