Risk examples

Here are 3 fictitious risks to show how they are completed using the standard template.  It is our intention to populate this with a library/bank of common risks by February 2023

Example 1 - Systems and technology risk

Ref

RISK001

Title

Systems and technology

Date raised

01/05/22

Risk owner

Director of Special Liaison

Root cause

Due to:

1. Multiple systems being used for the same process and poor integration between systems.

2. Increased need for remote working solutions (hardware and software)

3. Slow remote access for staff working from home

4. Lack of a systems roadmap

5. Heavy reliance on excel

6. Large number of manual processes

Risk description

There is a risk that:

1. There are cost and time Inefficiencies

2. Reduced staff efficiency

3. Increased likelihood of human error

4. Incorrect budgeting information produced

5. Poor or incorrect information used for decision making

Risk impact

This will result in:

1. Poor or misinformed decision making

2. Improvements and changes will not progress

3. No self-service reporting (reliance on certain staff to provide reporting)

4. Poor reporting

Strategy

Technology/IT

Movement

Worsening

Mitigation

Reduce

Proximity

Any time

Initial impact

4

Initial probability

4

Initial assessment

16

Actions

Complete end to end review of systems and process

Business Analyst

30/09/22

Design and sign off systems roadmap

Technical Analyst

31/10/22

Produce recommendations to improve integration

Project Manager

31/10/22

Develop remote working plan

Project Manager

31/10/22

Controls

Monthly review of access to systems

Technical Lead

30/09/22

Residual impact

3

Residual probability

3

Residual assessment

9

Escalation level

Special Liaison Leadership Team

Status

Open

Last review

01/05/22

Notes

 

Example 2 - Workforce development and organisation

Ref

RISK002

Title

Workforce development and organisation

Date raised

01/05/22

Risk owner

Director of Special Liaison

Root cause

Due to:

1. Lack of a succession planning strategy

2. Lack of clear career progression paths and mentorship

3. Lack of continuing professional development and training

4. Lack of alignment of personal performance with finance office objectives

Risk description

There is a risk that:

1. The mental health of staff members suffers or drop in staff moral

2. Poor staff engagement and retention

Risk impact

This will result in:

1. Poor service provided by Special Liaison team

2. Loss of key staff members or internally developed knowledge and experience.

3. Inability to attract and retain staff with the appropriate skill and expertise.

Strategy

People and OD

Movement

Stable

Mitigation

Reduce

Proximity

6 months to 1 year

Initial impact

5

Initial probability

3

Initial assessment

15

Actions

Map the shape of Special Liaison team by grade

Head of HR

30/06/22

Carry out 9 box grid analysis for >G6

Head of HR

31/07/22

Formalise a mentoring scheme

Deputy Director

31/07/22

Introduce lunchtime learning sessions

Team Lead

31/07/22

Controls

Review as part of PDR process

Deputy Director

31/10/22

Residual impact

5

Residual probability

2

Residual assessment

10

Escalation level

Special Liaison Leadership Team

Status

Open

Last review

01/05/22

Notes

Should this be escalated to Professional Services Group?

Example 3 - Communications and engagement

Ref

RISK003

Title

Communications and engagement

Date raised

01/05/22

Risk owner

Director of Special Liaison

Root cause

Due to:

1. Published material on website being out of date or inconsistent, within Special Liaison and across the University.

2. Lack of maintained distribution lists accessible to those who need them

3. No clear ownership of University web pages, or requirements to update them

Risk description

There is a risk that it is difficult for staff to find information about Special Liaison and our processes.

Risk impact

This will result in:

1. A culture of asking others rather than self service

2. Certain staff members becoming single points of failure

3. Inefficiencies created by asking colleagues rather than being able to access the information yourself

Strategy

External Relations

Movement

Improving

Mitigation

Reduce

Proximity

1 to 3 months

Initial impact

3

Initial probability

3

Initial assessment

9

Actions

Review what is currently in place on website and knowledge articles and training materials

Head of Comms

31/05/22

Restructure/allocate responsibility for content

Head of IT

30/06/22

Populate new web content

Head of IT

31/11/22

Launch new website

Head of Comms

15/12/22

Residual impact

2

Residual probability

2

Residual assessment

4

Escalation level

Special Liaison Leadership Team

Status

Open

Last review

01/05/22

Notes

Should this be passed to External Relations and the web team?

Last updated May 2022