Risk examples
Here are 3 fictitious risks to show how they are completed using the standard template. It is our intention to populate this with a library/bank of common risks by February 2023
Example 1 - Systems and technology risk
Ref |
RISK001 |
||
Title |
Systems and technology |
||
Date raised |
01/05/22 |
||
Risk owner |
Director of Special Liaison |
||
Root cause |
Due to: 1. Multiple systems being used for the same process and poor integration between systems. 2. Increased need for remote working solutions (hardware and software) 3. Slow remote access for staff working from home 4. Lack of a systems roadmap 5. Heavy reliance on excel 6. Large number of manual processes |
||
Risk description |
There is a risk that: 1. There are cost and time Inefficiencies 2. Reduced staff efficiency 3. Increased likelihood of human error 4. Incorrect budgeting information produced 5. Poor or incorrect information used for decision making |
||
Risk impact |
This will result in: 1. Poor or misinformed decision making 2. Improvements and changes will not progress 3. No self-service reporting (reliance on certain staff to provide reporting) 4. Poor reporting |
||
Strategy |
Technology/IT |
||
Movement |
Worsening |
||
Mitigation |
Reduce |
||
Proximity |
Any time |
||
Initial impact |
4 |
||
Initial probability |
4 |
||
Initial assessment |
16 |
||
Actions |
Complete end to end review of systems and process |
Business Analyst |
30/09/22 |
Design and sign off systems roadmap |
Technical Analyst |
31/10/22 |
|
Produce recommendations to improve integration |
Project Manager |
31/10/22 |
|
Develop remote working plan |
Project Manager |
31/10/22 |
|
Controls |
Monthly review of access to systems |
Technical Lead |
30/09/22 |
Residual impact |
3 |
||
Residual probability |
3 |
||
Residual assessment |
9 |
||
Escalation level |
Special Liaison Leadership Team |
||
Status |
Open |
||
Last review |
01/05/22 |
||
Notes |
|
Example 2 - Workforce development and organisation
Ref |
RISK002 |
||
Title |
Workforce development and organisation |
||
Date raised |
01/05/22 |
||
Risk owner |
Director of Special Liaison |
||
Root cause |
Due to: 1. Lack of a succession planning strategy 2. Lack of clear career progression paths and mentorship 3. Lack of continuing professional development and training 4. Lack of alignment of personal performance with finance office objectives |
||
Risk description |
There is a risk that: 1. The mental health of staff members suffers or drop in staff moral 2. Poor staff engagement and retention |
||
Risk impact |
This will result in: 1. Poor service provided by Special Liaison team 2. Loss of key staff members or internally developed knowledge and experience. 3. Inability to attract and retain staff with the appropriate skill and expertise. |
||
Strategy |
People and OD |
||
Movement |
Stable |
||
Mitigation |
Reduce |
||
Proximity |
6 months to 1 year |
||
Initial impact |
5 |
||
Initial probability |
3 |
||
Initial assessment |
15 |
||
Actions |
Map the shape of Special Liaison team by grade |
Head of HR |
30/06/22 |
Carry out 9 box grid analysis for >G6 |
Head of HR |
31/07/22 |
|
Formalise a mentoring scheme |
Deputy Director |
31/07/22 |
|
Introduce lunchtime learning sessions |
Team Lead |
31/07/22 |
|
Controls |
Review as part of PDR process |
Deputy Director |
31/10/22 |
Residual impact |
5 |
||
Residual probability |
2 |
||
Residual assessment |
10 |
||
Escalation level |
Special Liaison Leadership Team |
||
Status |
Open |
||
Last review |
01/05/22 |
||
Notes |
Should this be escalated to Professional Services Group? |
Example 3 - Communications and engagement
Ref |
RISK003 |
||
Title |
Communications and engagement |
||
Date raised |
01/05/22 |
||
Risk owner |
Director of Special Liaison |
||
Root cause |
Due to: 1. Published material on website being out of date or inconsistent, within Special Liaison and across the University. 2. Lack of maintained distribution lists accessible to those who need them 3. No clear ownership of University web pages, or requirements to update them |
||
Risk description |
There is a risk that it is difficult for staff to find information about Special Liaison and our processes. |
||
Risk impact |
This will result in: 1. A culture of asking others rather than self service 2. Certain staff members becoming single points of failure 3. Inefficiencies created by asking colleagues rather than being able to access the information yourself |
||
Strategy |
External Relations |
||
Movement |
Improving |
||
Mitigation |
Reduce |
||
Proximity |
1 to 3 months |
||
Initial impact |
3 |
||
Initial probability |
3 |
||
Initial assessment |
9 |
||
Actions |
Review what is currently in place on website and knowledge articles and training materials |
Head of Comms |
31/05/22 |
Restructure/allocate responsibility for content |
Head of IT |
30/06/22 |
|
Populate new web content |
Head of IT |
31/11/22 |
|
Launch new website |
Head of Comms |
15/12/22 |
|
Residual impact |
2 |
||
Residual probability |
2 |
||
Residual assessment |
4 |
||
Escalation level |
Special Liaison Leadership Team |
||
Status |
Open |
||
Last review |
01/05/22 |
||
Notes |
Should this be passed to External Relations and the web team? |
Last updated May 2022