Adam Smith Lecture in Jurisprudence - Well-Tempered Power: 'A Cultural Achievement of Universal Significance'
The Adam Smith Lecture in Jurisprudence is an annual public lecture, co-ordinated by the Glasgow Legal Theory research group, that seeks to continue the distinctive approach of the Scottish Enlightenment to legal philosophy. This years lecture will be delivered by Prof Martin Krygier, of the University of New South Wales, on the topic 'Well-Tempered Power'.
Glasgow Legal Theory Research Group
Date: Monday 10 June 2024
Time: 15:30 - 17:00
Venue: Humanities Lecture Theatre
Category: Public lectures, Academic events
Speaker: Martin Krygier
The Adam Smith Lecture in Jurisprudence seeks to make productive in a contemporary context the distinctive approach of the Scottish Enlightenment to legal philosophy. The Lecture invites some of the world’s most distinguished legal and political philosophers whose ideas have reached out beyond narrow disciplinary boundaries, to shape innovative thinking on key philosophical, political, and social aspects of law and government. It is envisaged that these lectures will form landmark moments in our understanding of contemporary debates on law and its place in an interconnected world.
This year's lecture will be delivered by Martin Krygier, of the University of New South Wales, in the Humanities Lecture Theatre at 3.30pm on June 10th. All are welcome to attend!
Abstract:
According to Laurent Pech, the rule of law was described as a “‘buzzword’ by [Hungary’s] justice minister; a fiction by a Fidesz MP; and a ‘magic word’ by the FideszKDNP Delegation to the European Parliament. Not to be undone, a judge from Hungary’s (captured) constitutional court, has presented the rule of law ‘as a normative yardstick’ which is little more than an empty nineteenth century ideal and a political joker [sic] for all purposes.” In contrast, the English historian, E.P. Thompson, controversially called the rule of law ‘a cultural achievement of universal significance.’
With some small amendments, Krygier will agree with Thompson. Each word in that encomium, he will seek to demonstrate, deserves emphasis and respect. However, he will argue, it makes a huge difference what one takes the rule of law to be about. What is universal is the notion and realisation of a state of affairs in which power is reliably tempered, with the aid of law, so as not to be available for arbitrary abuse. It is that which is a cultural achievement of universal significance. It is a mistake to identify it, as so many do, with any allegedly canonical arrangement of forms and institutions and rules that are enlisted or assumed to embody it. Many people make that mistake. Some do so, because they naively think that installation of familiar institutions they associate with ‘the rule of law’ is the same as achieving the ideal itself. The disappointing history of rule of law promotion around the world shows that is not the case. On the other hand, modern illiberal, often populist, regimes are happy to endorse such a mistake and pretend that they are committed to the ideal by making a show of conformity to legal forms, while systematically subverting and abusing the rule of law itself. If criticised, they claim their cultural, constitutional, identity is under attack. Both the naïve and the malicious interpretations should be rejected.