Projects
Understanding Sembrando Vida
Mexico’s Sembrando Vida, or “Sowing Life” program was launched by president Andrés Manuel López Obrador in 2019 as his signature program under the Secretary of Welfare. While often referred to as a “reforestation” program, Sembrando Vida actually seeks to address two problems: rural poverty and environmental degradation. Mexico, the 11th most-forested country in the world, is losing an average of nearly 213 thousand hectares of forest a year, according to the National Forestry Commission. The administration, on the Sembrando Vida website, diagnoses the causes of deforestation in this way: “Due to conditions of poverty, the rural regions of the country have undergone, in recent decades, a significant process of deforestation, and over-exploitation of its resources…”
The goals of Sembrando Vida include planting a million hectares of fruit and timber trees in agroforestry systems, supported by trained technicians, state-supervised nurseries, and “peasant learning communities.” The program currently claims to have 400,000 beneficiaries in 20 states throughout Mexico, who upon enrolling and adhering to the program, receive a salary of 5,000 MXN, 500 of which are placed into a savings account for them.
Sembrando Vida’s website reads, “Our objective is to contribute to the social welfare of the agrarian subjects in their rural locations and to promote their effective participation in the holistic development of their communities.” Touting the program as “agroecology” López Obrador presents it as a panacea for carbon sequestration, reforestation, poverty mitigation and amelioration of the migration crisis. In recent negotiations with the U.S. the Mexican president has proposed his vision be extended across Central America.
COP 26
On October 31st to November 12th 2021, the United Nations Climate Change Conference of Parties 26 (COP 26) was held in Glasgow. Despite the emphatic urgency of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and similar overtures by other political leaders, COP26 is roundly regarded as a failed deal, reached through “watered-down” language pushed by corporate lobbying. Recent calculations, assuming the most recent agreement will be in place, estimate planetary levels of warming will be 2.4 degrees, a considerable backslide from the 1.5 degrees target Declared in the Paris Agreement of 2015. The resolution has been called a “betrayal of global South countries.”
López Obrador (or “AMLO”) who was not present at the COP, critiqued the gathering of political and business leaders for their “hypocrisy” and failure to address “monstrous inequality” as a root cause of the climate crisis. Mexico was one of the last countries to sign on to a COP 26 pact of 105 countries to end deforestation by 2030, and AMLO’s administration has drawn fire from climate action groups for failure to commit to a clean energy transition.
In response to criticisms of Mexico’s half-hearted participation, López Obrador claimed that Sembrando Vida was, in fact, the inspiration for the pact on deforestation, pointing out that no other nation was spending 1.3 billion dollars annually to halt forest loss.
Our Project
Given the magnitude and scope, both actual and proposed, of Sembrando Vida in the Americas, and its positioning at COP as an example to the rest of the world, this project includes the collaboration of peasant leaders, defenders of territory, activists, and researchers to examine the impacts of Sembrando Vida on the ground and the implications of such state-led “agroecology from above.”
The project is a collaboration between the National Autonomous University of Mexico Merida and the University of Glasgow, and was funded by the Global Challenges Research Fund.
Cómo entender Sembrando Vida
El programa Sembrando Vida de México se arrancó por el presidente Andrés Manuel López Obrador en 2019 como su programa insignia bajo la Secretaría del Bienestar. Aunque a menudo se refiere como un programa de "reforestación", Sembrando Vida en realidad busca atender dos problemas: la pobreza rural y la degradación ambiental. México, el undécimo país más boscoso del mundo, está perdiendo un promedio de casi 213 mil hectáreas de bosque al año, según la Comisión Nacional Forestal. La administración, en el sitio web Sembrando Vida, diagnostica las causas de la deforestación de esta manera: "Debido a las condiciones de pobreza, las regiones rurales del país han sufrido, en las últimas décadas, un importante proceso de deforestación y sobreexplotación de sus recursos..."
Los objetivos de Sembrando Vida incluyen la plantación de un millón de hectáreas de árboles frutales y maderables en sistemas agroforestales, con el apoyo de técnicos capacitados, viveros supervisados por el Estado y "comunidades campesinas de aprendizaje''. El programa afirma tener actualmente 400.000 beneficiarios en 20 estados de México, que al inscribirse y adherirse al programa reciben un salario de 5.000 MXN, 500 de los cuales se depositan en una cuenta de ahorro para ellos.
El sitio web de Sembrando Vida dice: "Nuestro objetivo es contribuir al bienestar social de los sujetos agrarios en sus localidades rurales y promover su participación efectiva en el desarrollo integral de sus comunidades." Promoviendo el programa como "agroecología", López Obrador lo presenta como una panacea para la captura de carbono, la reforestación, la mitigación de la pobreza y la mejora de la crisis migratoria. En recientes negociaciones con Estados Unidos, el presidente mexicano ha propuesto que su visión se extienda a toda Centroamérica.
COP 26
Del 31 de octubre al 12 de noviembre de 2021 se celebró en Glasgow la Conferencia de las Partes de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático 26 (COP 26). A pesar de la enfática urgencia del primer ministro británico, Boris Johnson, y de las propuestas similares de otros líderes políticos, la COP26 se considera en general un acuerdo fallido, alcanzado mediante un lenguaje "diluido" impulsado por los grupos de presión empresariales. Cálculos recientes, asumiendo que el acuerdo más reciente estará en vigor, estiman que los niveles de calentamiento planetario serán de 2,4 grados, un retroceso considerable respecto al objetivo de 1,5 grados declarado en el Acuerdo de París de 2015. La resolución ha sido calificada como una "traición a los países del Sur global".
López Obrador (o "AMLO"), que no estuvo presente en la COP, criticó la reunión de líderes políticos y empresariales por su "hipocresía" y por no haber abordado la "monstruosa desigualdad" como causa fundamental de la crisis climática. México fue uno de los últimos países en firmar el pacto de la COP 26 de 105 países para poner fin a la deforestación para 2030, y la administración de AMLO ha sido criticada por los grupos de acción climática por no comprometerse con una transición energética limpia.
En respuesta a las críticas sobre la participación poco entusiasta de México, López Obrador afirmó que Sembrando Vida fue, de hecho, la inspiración para el pacto sobre la deforestación, señalando que ninguna otra nación estaba gastando 1.300 millones de dólares anuales para detener la pérdida de bosques.
Nuestro proyecto
Dada la magnitud y el alcance, tanto real como propuesto, de Sembrando Vida en las Américas, y su posicionamiento en la COP como ejemplo para el resto del mundo, este proyecto incluye la colaboración de líderes campesinos, defensores del territorio, activistas e investigadores para examinar los impactos de Sembrando Vida sobre el terreno y las implicaciones de esta "agroecología desde arriba" dirigida por el Estado.
El proyecto es una colaboración entre la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Mérida y la Universidad de Glasgow, y fue financiado por el Global Challenges Research Fund.
Further resources to understand sembrando vida
In this online webinar, academics, civil society and NGO actors, and community representatives discussed ‘Sembrando Vida’ – the new flagship programme for reforestation that is currently being operationalised in Chiapas, Mexico, and that has recently been promoted by the Mexican and US governments at COP26 in Glasgow as part of the solution to climate change. Speakers in the first panel located this programme against a broader background of state-led development initiatives . The second panel featured representatives from constituencies in Chiapas who will share their experiences with Sembrando Vida on the ground. See the recordings here:
https://gcils.org/?events=understanding-sembrando-vida-the-governmental-programme-in-mexico-that-inspired-the-cop-agreement-on-reforestation
Accompanying the Plan de Vida
The Selva Lacandona (Lacandon Jungle) is a region of important ecological and cultural diversity in Central America. The Selva Lacandona incorporates areas of the southern Mexican state of Chiapas and northern Guatemala, the two sides separated by the Usumacinta river. In Chiapas, the Indigenous people of the Lacandona live in three Bienes Comunales de la Zona Lacandona (BCZL), which are Lacanja, Nueva Palestina and Frontera Corozal. These Bienes Comunales have been recognised by the Mexican state since 1971, and in 1978 the presidential resolution was updated to recognise the Indigenous Chol, Tseltal, Tsotsil and Tojolabal speaking people, as well as the Maya Lacandon who were originally recognised in 1971. In 1978 the government also issued a resolution establishing the Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (covering 331,200 hectares). Some of the territories of the three Bienes Comunales lie within the Calakmul region of the Montes Azules Biosphere. The legislation regulating the conservation area restrict the way the Indigenous people of the (BCZL) can use their land.
In 2021 the people of Bienes Comunales de la Zona Lacandona (BCZL) initiated a process (comisión), with the approval of the Asamblea (local governments of the bienes comunales), to investigate, understand, and reinforce, the traditional ecological practices and local democratic practices of the people of the Lacandon. The people of the (BCZL) engaged in a grassroots democratic process, consulting with people of all genders and generations, and have designed a Plan de Vida, Life plan, for the communities. These meetings were known as the circles of the word, and were accompanied by local researchers (Rosa López, Alberto Vallejo Reyna, Rita Valencia), supported by the University of Glasgow in collaboration with ECOSUR (Chiapas).
The Plan de Vida activists of the Lacandon have used the community knowledge to develop a first draft of the Plan de Vida. This was published, with help from the University of Glasgow, in 2022. It is intended that this Plan de Vida be accepted by the Asamblea and used to update the existing agricultural statutes and enforce the agroecological practices from the grassroots up. In 2022 researchers from the Food Sovereignty Network (Emma Cardwell, Anna Chadwick, Julia McClure) visited the Bienes Comunales of the Lacandona and learned about the importance of grassroots agroecological processes for supporting food sovereignty, culture and democracy locally, and for fighting climate change and the expansion of colonial capitalism globally.
In 2023 the Glasgow based Food Sovereignty Network continued to support the Plan de Vida activists of the BCZL. They supported and accompanied a meeting between the people of the BCZL and the Autonomous University of Oaxaca (AUCO) in the Isthmo region of Oaxaca, and the asamblea of the Bienes Comunales of the Chimalapas. Food Sovereignty Network co-cordinator Julia McClure travelled from Chiapas to Oaxaca with the representatives of the Lacandona to present the Plan de Vida in the Isthmo and the Chimalapas. The Chimalapas is another area of ecological diversity currently at risk from megaprojects such as the transisthmus corridor. The meeting between the Indigenous people of the Lacandon and the Chimalapas was a historic and monumental meeting that can support Indigenous people in their efforts to reinforce their agroecological practices locally and fight climate change and the risks of neoliberal projects globally.
Illustration of the Plan de Vida by Angélica Ramírez
Presentation of the plan de vida book in a ceremony during a visit to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec
Sustainable Cities and Food Systems
For centuries, cities have been expanding around the world in unsustainable ways that have contributed to climate change. At the same time rural communities have faced increased pressures from the expansion of these cities, and increased pressures, including from climate change, have increased migration from rural to urban areas, exacerbating trends in unsustainable urbanisation. Colonialism and its legacies have created a world in which urban and rural societies, and people and nature are disconnected.
In recent decades, the drive to make cities more sustainable in order to address the threat posed by climate change and to improve the welfare of residents is well underway in many countries around the world. Indeed, cities like Copenhagen, are leading the way in mitigating and adapting to climate change. A number of models for sustainable city redesign have emerged in recent years and are at varying stages of implementation. The City of Amsterdam has advanced with the implementation of a model influenced by ‘Doughnut Economics’ (Raworth 2017) - a new approach to economic governance that requires that policies are elaborated within an outer ring of ‘planetary boundaries’ and an inner ring, the ‘social floor’. Other policy models advanced include ‘circular economies’, public-citizen owned renewable energy companies, ‘20-minute neighbourhoods’.
While advances are being made in some localities, the concept of sustainability upon which many of these initiatives rely remains vague and contested. Concerns have been voiced that the models that are getting the most traction are models that rely heavily on technocratic solutions to issues such as waste, energy use, and transport reform – models that leave the fundamental structures of a damaging growth-centric economic model intact. Significantly, few of the existing models for sustainable city redesign explicitly consider the relationship between urban planning and food systems, and the city and its surrounds.
As is well known, current models of food production that are highly industrialised, carbon intensive, and dependent on chemical inputs and last-minute distribution through global value chains are one of the leading causes of climate change. The need to transform our food systems in order to address a plethora of ecological issues, such as soil depletion, water contamination, and loss of biodiversity, as well as to tackle social and economic inequalities that result in multiple adverse health outcomes, is widely acknowledged. Yet, often, the necessary centrality of food systems to the project of designing sustainable cities is not reflected in policy making initiatives or academic models. Equally, the question of how to bring about food systems reform is sometimes focused on the reform of agriculture and activities in the countryside, and the question of how the ‘urban’ and the ‘rural’ interrelate is not specifically addressed. Finally, a great many of the efforts to make cities more sustainable in the global North neglect to consider important questions as to how the redesign of cities in the global ‘centre’, in the ‘core’ of the global political economy, will impact on populations in the ‘periphery’ - the global South. Patterns of industrialisation in both the global North and the global South are intimately interlinked owing to the colonial pasts and presents of international relations. Likewise, contemporary food systems are the legacy of colonial policies and law-making. Hence it is essential that models for creating sustainable cities take into account the impact that proposals and policies will have on constituencies in the global South.
Prior to colonialism, around the world there have been alternate examples of human cities where urban and rural zones, and people and nature, were less divided. In the Maya region of Mesoamerica prior to colonialism, Maya societies developed garden cities, with densely populated urban areas sustained both through urban growing and a close relationship with agroecological practices in the surrounding forests (Nigh and Ford, 2019). Increased understanding of examples of the world’s historic sustainable cities, histories that have been obscured by the colonial process, can help us to decolonise the future of sustainable cities, transcending the artificial boundaries that have been created between urban and rural zones and between people and nature.
The purpose of this one-day workshop is to bring together activists, academics, NGOs and other civil society actors to critically evaluate leading models for city redesign from the perspective of food system reform. By means of a series of presentations and interactive brainstorming sessions, the workshop will seek to offer an evaluation of 3-4 different models for sustainable cities bringing in the neglected foci outlined in this concept note.
The workshop is funded by a grant from GCID, and it is the culmination of a longer-standing project that brings together research teams from Glasgow and Mexico under the title ‘Sustainable Cities: Indigenous Histories of Mayan Garden Cities and the Future of Urban Growing’.
Examples of some of the Food Sovereignty Network’s funded projects:
• Strengthening Indigenous agro-ecological practices and reconnecting historically culturally and ecologically connected pathways in the South of Mexico, Impact Acceleration Funding, £6630 (2024)
• Sustainable Cities: Indigenous Histories of Mayan Garden Cities and the Future of Urban Growing, PI, co-Is Anna Chadwick, Mark Banks, Ross Beveridge, Global Challenges Research Fund (2022), £17K.
• Food Sovereignty Network, Dear Green Bothy creative arts funding (2021), £1,500.
• Re-costing the earth: indigenous governance of silviculture in Southern Mexico and the redesign of `sustainable development¿ consultation and impact assessment. PI with Anna Chadwick and Emma Cardwell, Global Challenges Research Fund (2020) £55,604.